Thursday, April 27, 2023

 Drawing lesson: painting on your school fellow



20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Promoting CFNM by posting photos of underage children is not only objectionable but almost certainly illegal.
Please delete

Anonymous said...

Yes, keep it to adults. It’s just wrong and creepy to include underage kids.

Buckeye5395 said...

All I see is CFNM.
Never gave underage a thought.
Looks like a lipstick party.
That boy could be so lucky.

Anonymous said...

They are clearly under the age of consent

Anonymous said...

Marie, please either delete or I am duty bound to report this post

Anonymous said...

Absolutely

Anonymous said...

They are NOT clearly under the age of consent. They are obviously asian, probably Japanese, and you can clearly see that the pubic and leg hair on the male is of an adult. If you can't see that, you are culturally ignorant. These are simply young adults.

Anonymous said...

You pussies that don't like this, just move on and stop being the self-appointed monitors of what we should see. These are clearly not children. GTFO!

CFNM1976 said...

If they are minors then the post should be taken down. I want CFNM to be a source of good clean fun.

CFNM1976 said...

It's hard to say there are shot glasses in the picture. The could be in college. But I hope they are legal. Some people just look younger than they are.

Anonymous said...

What's evidence they are underage? Nothing! The word shool in the post title?
Some people simply want to suck the world!

Anonymous said...

Well said

Anonymous said...

There is a name for people who derive pleasure from these types of images. I hope it doesn't apply to anyone using this site

Anonymous said...

First commenter:

What is "underage"? In Japan, the age of consent is 13.

Learn your facts before you start whining here.

Anonymous said...

Under age young adults

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your opinion.
Heres a fact for you.
Japan recently agreed to increase their age of consent to 16.

Anonymous said...

They are drinking and having fun. I doubt they're underage.

Anonymous said...

Smartie @ May 2 5:23,

As of yet it has not been done. Even so, not only was this photo taken during the age 13 era, but those in the photo are at least 16 anyway, and probably over 18.

So, take your whining elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

Happy to 'whine' if it means calling inappropriate images and those who advocate them
I'm sure there are plenty of sites which cater to those particular needs most if not all are probably illegal

Anonymous said...

Quick backtrack there when you realised you were suggesting sexualising 13 year olds is acceptable. Interesting