Wednesday, October 08, 2025

Her boyfriend refuses to take off his underwear 

and she humiliates him 

by posing with three naked men azur


 

17 comments:

Bmann said...

Nice group shot. However, unless the written description was given to Marie when the photos were submitted, I doubt very much if it is accurate. I suspect that the man with the shorts on, is not even the boyfriend of the girl.

Anonymous said...

Nope, his boyfriend is the guy to his left. Marie has a strange fantasy life.

M Gallagher said...

These photos always have the most farfetched description of what it could possibly be.

Bmann said...

Anonymous, your pronouns were the wrong gender but I get your point. Yes, the guy to the far left looks more like he knows her.
Yes, M Gallagher, I log-on to this site mostly to view the photos. But the descriptions and some of the comments written by fellow commenters, are often pure fiction. Personally I don't see the need to write the description that was written. Unless it is to appeal to the Indian contingent which seems to need embarrassment and ridicule as part of the CFNM narrative. Which I also do not understand.

Anonymous said...

She needs to shave them!

Joe said...

NO! the 2 guys on end have GREAT bushes.

Bmann said...

"Shave or not to shave", is a great survey question for everyone on here. Voice your opinion.
When I was in my twenties or thirties, I experimented and shaved all my pubic hair off. I felt like it made me look like a little boy and I was embarrassed. Now I shave it all but sometimes I leave a small patch. When I look at photos of men who are completely shaved, I think it gives a much better view of the balls. IMO, the two guys in this photo are excessively hairy. It's like a jungle.

Anonymous said...

Too hairy, all the ladies I know prefer smooth, as a life model my inclination is the same. An artist ( female) once said smooth is better, there's more to draw !

Anonymous said...

I actually think that the boyfriend is the one with the underwear and that the girl hugs a naked guy just to get back at him because he's dressed and to embarrass him.

Bmann said...

So far, counting myself - 3 votes for smooth, 1 vote for hairy. Keep those votes coming. No pun intended.

Bmann said...

Anonymous (second one) - Hogwash. Balderdash. Your explanation is another one of those fictitious, intentionally false narratives intended to create an emotional "back story" that does not exist. I realize that type of explanation helps you enjoy cfnm, for reasons that I do not understand. That said, fictional theories are fine, I guess, as long as we all label it as unsubstantiated fiction.

Bmann said...

By the way, those two guy's cock jungles are thick and dense. Especially when you look at their upper bodies and view sparse or very little chest hair. I am the reverse with intense chest hair, some back hair, but sparse or low density pubic and leg hair.
I am curious how many men are like those of the photo or like me. Maybe add that to your survey response.

Jean Luc said...

smooth is better for men and women

Anonymous said...

I agreevthatvthectwo men on the right of the picture are probably a couple. Pink hat guy is definitely not the girls boyfriend.
As for hairy etc, I prefer to be mostly shaved at public nudity events. A particularly hirsute man, retain some hair on my pubis. But l don't think the ladies appreciate a hairy back, shoulders or legs etc.

Bmann said...

I think we have a trend on the "smooth versus hairy bush" survey. If my counting is correct, at this point we have 5 votes for smooth and 1 for hairy bush lovers. And although I agree with Jean Luc, that most women prefer smooth or "manscaped", I don't believe that any women voted in my little unofficial survey. I encourage women to vote, as this site is mostly about giving women what they want to see.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if one of the guys, naked or clothed, is the girl's boyfriend, but I disagree with the negative comments. Mariè's blog is fantastic, not just for the real CFNM photos—real situations, not porn pics!
But also for the stories, interpretations, and fantasies that accompany them. !! You're not interested, but it doesn't matter to many others!

Bmann said...

Anonymous October 11, 5:58PM - You misunderstand the comments of myself and others who are suggesting that false explanations of a photo are not ideal.
I love this Blog, and given that Marie is curating it all by herself, it is amazing.

You obviously, have no problem with misleading, falsified, unsupported descriptions of photos. Some people here are just like you. It's just that when I see a clown on a unicycle, I don't describe him as a "cross-dresser flying a plane". Reality works better for me.
But to you and those others who enjoy descriptions and captions that are fiction, all I can say is don't let my comments stop you. You will find a lot of false statements here designed to spark your fantasies.